[Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netSat Apr 11 06:56:34 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jan Heichler" <jan.heichler at gmx.net> >To: "richard walsh" <richard.walsh at comcast.net> >Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org >Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 3:56:10 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern >Subject: Re[2]: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs > >Hallo richard, > >Freitag, 10. April 2009, meintest Du: > > Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote: >> On Wednesday 08 April 2009 19:48:30 Joe Landman wrote: >>> As an FYI, Beowulf veteran Jeff Layton wrote up a nice article on >>> memory >>> configuration issues for Nehalem (I had seen some discussion on this >>> previously). >>> >>> Link is here: >>> http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/04-08-2009+-+Nehalem+and+Memory+Configur >>> ations >> >> That's a great write-up, gathering all the useful information in one >> place. A must read. Thanks Jeff! It is a good write up, very good ... but there looks to be an error under "Memory Bandwidth Performance" ... first, for socket-local-memory, I am not sure of the relevance of the QPI GT rate. I would calculate the maximum rate to socket-local-memory with 1 DIMM per channel at: 1.333 GHz x 3 Channels x 8 bytes = 31.992 GBytes/sec not 35 GByters/sec. Maybe I am doing something wrong. ´ > > >I understood the 35 GB/s to be the transfer rate that you reach when >accessing Memory with 8 Cores. So it involves 6 Channels (2 CPUs, >3 channels each). ~64 GB/s (theory) - 35 GB/s (real life). Makes sense >to me. 64 GB/sec is the right dual-socket theoretical number for this situation, and Intel presents the value of 33 GB/sec for the stream triad for the dual socket boards, so 35 GB/sec could be a copy perhaps, but nothing was mentioned about any benchmark in the memory piece. In any case, I think we have the right theoretical and probable real-world numbers expressed here, if people were wondering. rbw _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090411/bced5da3/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem memory configs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
