[Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Cutts tjrc at sanger.ac.ukFri Apr 3 23:16:44 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3 Apr 2009, at 11:11 pm, Mark Hahn wrote: >> involved with Linux, and open source things such as XFS we would not >> have the enterprise-level features that we see now. > > unclear in several ways. for instance, linux has hotplug cpu > and memory support, but I really think this is dubious, since > there's damn little hardware that supports it, _anywhere_. > it's more of a "bank" feature rather than merely gold-plated > "enterprise". We should all be able to use it in a couple of months, in the virtualisation world. The next release of VMware infrastructure is going to support hot adding and removal of CPUs and memory to its virtual machines. > XFS may have been fairly "enterprise" for its time - it's been > available for linux for quite a while, I think. but if you look > at options today, is it clearly the only "enterprise" choice? > certainly not - ext3 and 4 are certainly viable, though perhaps not > in every possible application. JFS is presumably also an example of > big-corp contributed "enterprise" software, but I'd say has had even > less of an effect. dare I mention advfs, which has now been open- > sourced? Too late, unfortunately. If HP has actually open-sourced AdvFS years ago, when they announced the discontinuation of Tru64, things would have been a lot better for us. But we've taken the hit now, and copied all our data of it, so we don't care any more. > from my position, XFS was a semi-fringe option for people who > distrusted ext3 for some reason. (and there were a few solid ones, > mainly just >8TB.) going forward, I expect to use ext4 > and probably btrfs; I don't see a lasting impact of XFS. btrfs does indeed look good. I'll continue to mainly use XFS until brfs gets here. > if IBM did buy Sun and made an effort to get ZFS Linux-ized > (Linus-ized), it would be interesting. especially if they also did > so with Lustre. Er, in what way is Lustre not already 'Linuxised'? It's a standard part of Debian Lenny, for example. Regards, Tim -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
