[Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.comThu Apr 2 11:47:02 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Ian Dillon wrote: > Likewise Joe, watching the demise of SGI has been incredibly hard to fathom. > This was a great company with tons of energy/potential and did right by > their employees back in the day. I think this is why so many of us feel for > the company and its current employee base. Lest we look only through our rose-colored glasses (and I have my own fond memories), we shouldn't forget the bad. I recall many dispirited SGI designers, having just wasted a year of their lives designing a product that was killed just before tape-out, or not put into production because of internal politics. In the mid-1990s SGI was a company that didn't realize that a team that could deliver working systems was rare and precious. A few people here will remember that disaster of SGI trying to run Cray. The culture clash couldn't have been more extreme. -- Donald Becker becker at scyld.com Penguin Computing / Scyld Software www.penguincomputing.com www.scyld.com Annapolis MD and San Francisco CA
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
