[Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduTue Sep 30 09:10:40 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prentice Bisbal wrote: > This brings up something else I was wondering about: If you truly strip > down the OS running the nodes so that its just a tiny kernel and only > the essential libraries, the users would have to compile all their > software (assuming they compile their own code, like they do here) > statically linked. > > Is anyone here using an arrangement like that? Is that too impractical? From 50,000 feet up, this is one of the main differences between Rocks and Perceus. With Rocks you get a turn key system with lots of stuff already installed and configured. With Perceus, you start off with very little, but you can build what you want and add it to the vnfs capsules. Comparing and contrasting these approaches is a good topic for another thread. Cordially, -- Jon Forrest Research Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
