[Beowulf] One network, or two?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Alan Ward award at uda.adTue Sep 23 12:16:19 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SCore MPI on quad core
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Good day. I have been reading the ongoing discussion on network usage with some interest, mainly because in all (admittedly very small, 4 to 8 node) clusters we have set up so far, we have always gone with doubling the network. Nowadays we mostly run a 100 MBit/s "el cheapo" FastEthernet for control, NFS and monitoring, while the faster Gigabit is exclusively for MPI. Applications are CFD, with various levels of granularity. Anybody care to comment? -Alan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080923/58ff9886/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SCore MPI on quad core
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list