[Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Sep 18 12:15:19 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> http://www.cray.com/Products/CX1/Product/Specifications.aspx >> claims 1600W, 92% efficient. their pages don't give much info on the this is just for 1 psu, and at least 2 are needed. > 1600W for 8 8-core, 300 MHz, 2 GB/core RAM blades at full computational > load? sorry, my post was misleading. it's 3200 for 64c, 200W/socket. these sockets are 80W TDP (50W option), so that seems pretty believable. > Somebody just mailed me specs offline that suggested 375W/card, which is I see up to about 350W with my power meter on a commodity (HP) dual 2.67 intel quad-core system. (1 disk, 8GB non-fbdimm memory).
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
