[Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comWed Sep 17 17:51:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Eric Thibodeau <kyron at neuralbs.com> wrote: > Rahul Nabar wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Eric Thibodeau <kyron at neuralbs.com> wrote: > Well, I don't have "bondable" hardware so I'm really interested in how you > technically manage this one at the end. > The more I do this, the more I get this uneasy feeling that this hasn't been done much before? :) Not too many guides that bond for bandwidth-aggregation. None at all for strict peer-to-peer bandwidth-aggregation. Am I trying to do the impossible? Most people seem to use bonding for fault tolerance or a one-to-many communication pipe.I really need more anecdotes and comments from other guys who successfully use bonding. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
