[Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduWed Sep 10 16:46:39 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] GPU boards and cluster servers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > John, > > I'd go for AMD thing. [justification for above snipped] This all may be true, but I don't see anything on the AMD web site that's anywhere near as complete as the CUDA development tools on the NVidia site. What I'm hearing from putting my ears to the railroad tracks is the OpenCL is going to be the Great Unification of all the various approaches to GPU computing. This is because the application vendors can't stand doing a CUDA port, an AMD port, ... With OpenCL in theory they'll only have to do one port, and the tool chain creators will only have to create one tool chain. Anyway, I wasn't really asking about all this. I was only wondering which board provides the most power for the least amount of money for a near-term pilot project. Cordially, -- Jon Forrest Research Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] GPU boards and cluster servers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
