[Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caTue Sep 9 14:46:50 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Again, I'm not picking on Dell specifically. I've seen this behavior > with other large vendors. My point is that "on-site support" usually > isn't always, so don't believe the hype. I think highly of HP service and HP hardware in general. we always spec onsite/NBD support. at first, we spent a lot of time talking through tier-1 support, but fairly quickly were given ways to bypass that. I don't think we paid extra, but I also don't think HP's giving it as charity, since an HPC site will typically have just a few, clueful contacts opening cases, who can efficiently interact with higher-level support. I don't really have signficant data for any other vendor. for small sites or individuals, it make a lot of sense (for the vendor) to try to filter out some of the randomness of support calls before committing a person. of course, a good CRM system would help this - perhaps that's why RGB gets satisfaction from Dell... I _do_ wish it was a bit more common to have onsite spares. not sure why vendors (HP at least) don't like to do this. maybe just that it might get kicked around or otherwise abused... regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
