[Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduMon Sep 8 14:13:07 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > Prentice Bisbal wrote: > >> I'm sure even in the computer world a similar rule applies. $ = cheap >> components, $$= better components, etc. > > A Xeon is a Xeon is a Xeon. > > Some RAM DIMM builders use ... ah ... less than spectacular ... parts. > > But peel off some of the carefully applied labels on the tier-1 units > and you find some ... interesting ... things beneath (usually the labels > that say you void your warranty if you remove them). > Been there, done that. I love that SGI wanted $4k for a fibre-channel HBA for an Origin 350, which was made by QLogic, and bought the exact same thing for only $800 from CDW. Of course, SGI would refuse to support it if I ever had a tech support issue, but that never happened. I know Sun and the other big Unix Co's did the same thing, which is why we all use Linux on commodity hardware these days. -- Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
