[Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, James P james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Sep 3 06:44:44 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/3/08 2:04 AM, "Greg Lindahl" <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:54:05AM -0400, Peter St. John wrote: > >> I think a physicist programming is like an astronomer grinding lenses (maybe >> nobody does that anymore). Some astronomers (in the old days) ground their >> own lenses and ended up contributing to optics; others never looked through >> telescopes, they do math on the measurements taken by others. > > This is the 2nd funniest posting in this thread. Did you notice that > ground-based telescopes recently started being much, much bigger? > These new lenses were invented and made in Arizona by an astronomer, > who figured out how to spin molten glass into roughly the right shape, > instead of taking a huge, flat, thick piece of glass and grinding it > into the shape of a mirror. > > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4773461 > > > > > ---- Ahem.. Reflectors, not lenses And, actually, the fact that a spinning body of liquid assumes a parabolic shape has been known for centuries (Kepler?), and, in fact, as early as 1850, an astronomer (Ernesto Capocci) proposed and built a telescope using liquid metal (e.g. Mercury) for a reflector. He probably wasn¹t unique, as there are mentions of a Mr. Buchan in notes by Brewster (as in Brewster angle) about the same time. There¹s a fascinating thesis by Brad Gibson from Univ of Vancouver that gives a dozen or so pages of all the problems faced with liquid metal telescopes (ripples, etc.) > What Dr Angel and the folks in Arizona have done is build an enormous spinning oven and worked out the process controls (more of an engineering task than a science, one, I might add.. Being an Engineer, I think these distinctions are important, not that new science isn't being done here). They also still have to do a conventional polishing step, but, at least the general figure of the mirror¹s surface is already close to what it needs to be. (Interestingly, there¹s apparently an article about this in Science News back in Feb 1985, which is when the latest work in LMTs got going at Laval) Jim Lux
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
