[Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comThu Nov 20 05:21:48 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Regarding the hyperbolic (etc) classification of PDEs: you may want qualitative theory instead of (or in additon to) number crunching. I'd suggest stopping over at UC Davis, where I count at least half a dozen PDE folks in the applied math program (more if you count the turbulence and fluid dynamics folks). Never miss an opportunity to buy a mathematician lunch :-) Peter On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Finch, Ralph <rfinch at water.ca.gov> wrote: > As we know by now GPUs can run some problems many times faster than CPUs > (e.g. http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-highperformance). From > what I understand GPUs are useful only with certain classes of numerical > problems and discretization schemes, and of course the code must be > rewritten to take advantage of the GPU. > > I'm part of a group that is purchasing our first beowulf cluster for a > climate model and an estuary model using Chombo > (http://seesar.lbl.gov/ANAG/chombo/). Getting up to speed (ha) on > clusters I started wondering if packages like Chombo, and numerical > problems generally, would be rewritten to take advantage of GPUs and GPU > clusters, if the latter exist. From decades ago when I actually knew > something I vaguely recall that PDEs can be classed as to parabolic, > hyperbolic or elliptic. And there are explicit and implicit methods in > time. Are some of these classifications much better suited for GPUs > than others? Given the very substantial speed improvements with GPUs, > will there be a movement to GPU clusters, even if there is a substantial > cost in problem reformulation? Or are GPUs only suitable for a rather > narrow range of numerical problems? > > Ralph Finch, P.E. > California Dept. of Water Resources > Delta Modeling Section, Bay-Delta Office > Room 215-13 > 1416 9th Street > Sacramento CA 95814 > 916-653-7552 > rfinch at water.ca.gov > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081120/7875621f/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
