[Beowulf] Сlos network vs fat tree
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netThu Nov 13 09:54:35 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Hardware considerations for running wrf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Сlos network vs fat tree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sorry, is it correct to say that fat tree topology is equal to *NON-BLOCKING* Clos network w/addition of "uplinks" ? I.e. any non-blocking Clos network w/corresponding addition of uplinks gives fat tree ? I read somewhere that exact evidence of "non-blocking" was performed for Clos networks with >= 3 levels. But most popular Infiniband fat trees has only 2 levels. (Yes, I know that "non-blocking" for Clos network isn't "absolute" :-)) Mikhail
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Hardware considerations for running wrf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Сlos network vs fat tree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
