[Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Dave Love d.love at liverpool.ac.ukTue Nov 11 06:51:46 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prentice Bisbal <prentice at ias.edu> writes: > The advantage of using IPMI is that it is hardware based, so there > shouldn't be any OS noise to slow down the MPI calculations. Yes iff you do it out-of-band, which is probably less convenient, and is significantly slower on our systems, at least. Actually, is it clear that interacting with the firmware generally won't cause any jitter? I could imagine it might. Our vendor installed a daemon doing in-band IPMI sensor probes which I didn't initially know about, since it wasn't sending the ganglia metrics correctly anyhow. I don't know whether that means they disagree with the effect on MPI performance or what.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
