[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.comSun May 11 14:17:22 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karen Shaeffer wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:42:18PM -0700, Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> Karen Shaeffer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> To implement full IPMI capability on the system board, then you need >>> two separate and independent power distribution systems on the system >>> board I believe, which is why they implement IPMI with a daughterboard. >> +5volt standby from the atx power supply is used to provide wake-on-lan >> functionality and power a ipmi implementation. it is available when >> the system is otherwise off. >> > Hi Joel, > Yes, but a separate and distinct power distribution for that +5 volt > supply will then need to be implemented on the system board to support > a full IPMI implementation residing on the system board. Uh... you see it being used to power both the ethernet (for WOL) and the Baseband mangment controller. > That was my > point. You are confusing power source with implemented PCB power > distribution. No I'm not. > Thanks, > Karen
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
