[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Karen Shaeffer shaeffer at neuralscape.comSun May 11 08:14:13 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:45:05AM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > >>I find that with IPMI and console redirection, it's very rarely necessary > >>to > >>care about where your nodes are, at least from a sysadmin perspective. > > > >Speaking of IPMI, are there reasonable motherboards that incorporate > >it right into the design at this point, or is it still mostly an add > >on? > > bit of both - supermicro and tyan both rely on add-in cards, but > HP (and probably some other vendors) have integrated IPMI onboard. > I keep reading stuff from Intel and AMD about managability which > sounds tantalizingly like IPMI-like managability being integrated > into the chipset. > > I think the main issue is that ipmi needs a lan interface, though > I guess there are some examples of it sharing a port with the host. Hi, To implement full IPMI capability on the system board, then you need two separate and independent power distribution systems on the system board I believe, which is why they implement IPMI with a daughterboard. Thanks, Karen -- Karen Shaeffer Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306 shaeffer at neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
