[Beowulf] many cores and ib
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netMon May 5 06:54:33 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Jaime, Montag, 5. Mai 2008, meintest Du: JP> Hello, JP> Just a small question, does anybody has experience with many core JP> (16) nodes and infiniband? Since we have some users that need JP> shared memory but also we want to build a normal cluster for JP> mpi apps, we think that this could be a solution. Let's say about JP> 8 machines (96 processors) pus infiniband. Does it sound correct? JP> I'm aware of the bottleneck that means having one ib interface for JP> the mpi cores, is there any possibility of bonding? Bonding (or multi-rail) does not make sense with "standard IB" in PCIe x8 since the PCIe connection limits the transfer rate of a single IB-Link already. My hint would be to go for Infinipath from QLogic or the new ConnectX from Mellanox since message rate is probably your limiting factor and those technologies have a huge advantage over standard Infiniband SDR/DDR. Infinipath and ConnectX are available as DDR Infiniband and provide a bandwidth of more than 1800 MB/s. Cheers, Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080505/ed89a351/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
