[Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Moore eemoore at fyndo.comMon Mar 31 21:57:10 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Forrest <jlforrest at berkeley.edu> writes: > I appreciate everyone's comments so far, but please > keep in mind that I only meant to comment on the > use of "codes" (plural). The use of "code" in place > of "program" feels normal. >From the WWII German surrender documents at: http://www.law.ou.edu/ushistory/germsurr.shtml I found this: This German Flag Officer is to be accompanied by a Communications Officer who is familiar with the German Naval W/T organization and who is to bring with him the current naval communications Orders, including allocation of frequencies, list of W/T and R/T call signs in force, and a list of all codes and cyphers in use, and intended to be brought into use. So certainly the use of "codes" as a plural for "code" was preexisting in the English language by the time "code" became a synonym for "program", so if "code" for "program" is accepted, there's no reason to look to non-native speakers for "codes" for "programs". (The surrender documents are not English translations of something in German, they make the point several times that the English version is authoritative). -- Eric
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
