[Beowulf] visualization machine
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comMon Mar 31 16:03:51 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] visualization machine
- Next message: [Beowulf] visualization machine
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > Geoff Jacobs wrote: > >> No nvidia for me unless they open up driver specs. Open drivers have a >> history of being very, very stable if not as fast. Nvidia does have good >> drivers, but I have definitely seen them experience problems. > > Silicon Image SATA drivers are great examples of open drivers that have > been (in the past) terrible. The tg3 drivers have been very bad (start > sending lots of packets and watch your CSW climb and climb and climb). > Forcedeth are still terrible, and are open. The nv driver in X often > breaks on newer hardware (the laptop I type this on is a testament to > this problem). There is no magic bullet :) I was referring specifically to graphics drivers. Sorry. I'm surprised the nv driver has problems, as it is contributed to by NVidia. > No, open-ness doesn't equate to good-ness. Open-ness equates to > portability, ability to hunt for problems on your own and correct them > if need be. I find that open-ness tends to allow better integration (less problems when switching between kernel framebuffer and X, for example). As well, I don't like the idea of having hardware orphaned because it just got EOLed and NVidia or ATI is not going to support it in future driver releases. > For the platforms I have used them on the nVidia drivers (the closed > source ones) have been *fantastic* in performance, compatibility, and so > forth. I have not (ever) had a good experience with ATI graphics > drivers ... so much so that I conciously avoid buying their products > (which is hard in the laptop space, as nVidia doesn't have as many > design wins). I don't use the ATI closed source drivers on Linux. > This said, one area we would have liked to have seen open nVidia drivers > is on our Itanium2 box. Yeah, it is a relic in the making, and no, I > don't blame nVidia for dropping support for it. It would be nice to be > able to see graphics on it though ... well ... accelerated graphics > (there is a nice Quadro FX 1100 in there now). Oh well (move that card > somewhere else). I wouldn't blame them either -- it's a reality of business. Still, it sucks from the users perspective. > Just my $0.01 (used to be $0.02, but the dollar is dropping in value). -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] visualization machine
- Next message: [Beowulf] visualization machine
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
