[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduFri Jun 27 05:52:43 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lombard, David N wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:14:50PM +0100, andrew holway wrote: >> I know where this is going and right away I'm going to trump you with >> this picture of a trailor park mansion:- >> http://bp1.blogger.com/_CCeVPrmu0G8/R8g0BnShRiI/AAAAAAAAAeU/M_ZJvm985yA/s1600-h/redneckmansion2.BMP > > OK, so the container in the lower right corner (and the others presumably > behind the other on-ground units) is at least loaded along expected load > paths. > > The on-end containers though, that support the units above the 2nd, um, > level--I started to write "is really scary", but who am I kidding!? > The WHOLE THING is *beyond* scary. There simply isn't any expectation of > containers being loaded along that axis. BTW, that middle on-end > container, supporting the highest unit, also looks to be standing on a > platform behnd the white/yellow trailer. One fun way that this sorry > example could be worse is if two containers were stacked on end... > > FWIW, the on-end containers present an 8'x8.5' (2.4m x 2.6m) footprint. > Containers are 20 ft (6.1 m) or 40 ft (12.2 m) long when used in > containerized shipboard transport*; they can be longer for non-shipboard > uses, e.g., truck and rail. > > APL does support longer containers. > Our off-topic conversation has somehow gone... off-topic! Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
