[Beowulf] A simple cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comThu Jun 26 10:45:53 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A simple cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] A simple cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I recall discussion of the hybrid approach, which I think most of the list doesn't much like, but interested me on account of my application. But I hadn't realized that hybrid was required by OpenMP for multi node architectures. So yeah, I'll just go with MPI for starters. When I start :-) Peter On 6/26/08, Geoff Jacobs <gdjacobs at gmail.com> wrote: > > Peter St. John wrote: > > Geoff, > > Oops! I totally misunderstood it. So it's strictly shared-memory, and > > requires something like MPI for crossing nodes. Gotcha. Big mistake, > thanks. > > Peter > > > Shared memory only, yes. Many, many people skip OpenMP completely and go > pure MPI. From a coding standpoint it's far easier to multiprocess using > one technique rather than two, and the performance gains for using both > tend to be marginal or non-existent -- at least in my experience. > > There was a long discussion a while back on the list about the pros and > cons of each approach. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080626/457e0963/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A simple cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] A simple cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
