[Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comMon Jun 23 23:38:12 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Your MPI (and OpenMP) should do this for you. > > Although not always correctly, it may assume that it can > allocate from core 0 onwards leading to odd performance > issues if you happen to get two 4 CPU jobs running on the > same node.. Most clusters I've seen aren't used that way (whole nodes only), but sure, you can always consult the manual in that case. Scali has posted here several times about how they handle it, and I believe the PathScale OpenMP and InfiniPath MPI manuals explicitly discuss it. OpenMPI discusses how they don't yet handle this case at: http://www.open-mpi.de/faq/?category=tuning#using-paffinity -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
