[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comThu Jun 19 21:03:04 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> writes: >> Isn't it a common practice in HPC to keep security rules relatively >> relaxed *inside* a cluster (passwordless logins between compute >> nodes for instance), whilst trying to harden the links to the >> external world? > > Yes. Leave the window wide open while bolting the door tight ... :( I don't think that's "leaving the window open" since there is no window. If the only way to get to the cluster network is through a head node that is actually secure, then it is just fine to treat the cluster network as if it were the backplane of a single box and leave the cluster nodes fairly open. The head node can dispatch arbitrary jobs to all the boxes anyway, and once you've got code running on a box you can often break root anyway. One has to be reasonable about these things. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
