[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comThu Jun 19 13:03:33 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Regarding: [RGB] Fortunately, there isn't that much Uranium on the planet, and we're burning it at a furious rate. We could conceivably deplete the currently known reserves in a matter of decades; it is NOT a long term solution to the problem of fossil fuel use. rgb Isn't there a scheme for creating fissionable material from more common stuff (hafnium?) by bombarding it with neutrons excited out of their nuclei by laster pulses? So one might make bombs without U235? (See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium#Applications) Peter P.S. Geothermal is a long term solution, maybe; see http://geothermal.inel.gov/publications/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf but I'm still hoping for practicable fusion. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080619/5016ab2c/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
