[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Jun 19 10:19:28 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote: > On Thursday 19 June 2008 06:58:44 am Robert G. Brown wrote: >> Getting too big >> or two small an explosion can either kill your own troops or not kill >> all of the enemy on an actual battlefield. > > To add some more OT stuff to this thread, I don't think a nuclear weapon > has ever been used (or even considered being used) to kill troops on a > battlefield. Some cluster bombs (hey, back on topic! :)) are probably > enough for this purpose. Tactical nukes (aimed at armies) were on the table for a few of the NATO scenarios involving responses to Soviet invasion of western Europe (based upon some of the historical reading, though I am not sure how serious they were). The western Europeans were understandably un-enthusiastic about such scenarios. > IMHO, a nuclear weapon is mainly a dissuasion weapon, ie, one you claim > you own to make your ennemies think twice before they strike you. Or > that you use against civilians to make your point louder, and let your > ennemies understand they'd better surrender. This makes a number of fundamental presumptions, which may not be true in all cases. First and foremost, it assumes that the potential recipient of the attack or response to attack is a rational actor. As seen on the world stage, this isn't always the case. A rational head of government will balance the lives lost in an attack against any possible gains. An irrational apocalyptic head of government will not likely make that calculation, but an alternative one in which they somehow come out a winner regardless of the events. Second, it assumes that the potential recipient of the attack or response to attack is state based. This has also been demonstrated to be problematic on today's world stage. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
