[Beowulf] Is PowerXCell eDP fully IEEE 754 compliant ... ?? ... the old Cell is/was ...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netThu Jun 12 09:12:34 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RHEL5 network throughput/scalability
- Next message: [Beowulf] Roadrunner picture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, I have not been able to get an exact answer to this question. The older chip, while much slower in double-precision was fully IEEE compliant I am fairly sure. I believe that IBM has improved the compliance of single-precision in the PowerXCell (although it is still not fully compliant), but its double- precision has fallen back to the single precision level of compliance to allow for the performance boost. This leaves it at close to parity in compliance when compared to the competition (ATI and NVIDIA) in the volume-economics DLP accelerator arena. Could someone that is certain of the answer to this question clarify? Best Regards, rbw -- "Making predictions is hard, especially about the future." Niels Bohr -- Richard Walsh Thrashing River Consulting-- 5605 Alameda St. Shoreview, MN 55126 Phone #: 612-382-4620 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080612/4f5f0370/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RHEL5 network throughput/scalability
- Next message: [Beowulf] Roadrunner picture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
