[Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge Hakon.Bugge at scali.comThu Jan 31 01:50:50 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CALL FOR WORKSHOP PROPOSALS: OnTheMove OTM Federated Conferences and Workshops 2008
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 21:01 30.01.2008, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: >whenever I ask about IB bandwidth, people always point fingers >at weather codes, which apparently are fond of doing the transpose >in multi-dimension FFT's using all-to-all. while convenient, this >seems a bit silly, since transpose is O(N) communications, not O(N^2). Mark, interconnect does matter. Here is a solid benchmark using WRF, 128 cores, Woodcrest 3.00GHz. System spec can be found at http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/res2007q4/mpi2007-20071013-00029.html Scali MPI Connect 5.6.2 using IB (IB as specified in the link above): Success 127.wrf2 base mref ratio 21.03, runtime 370.653066 Scali MPI Connect 5.6.2 using Gbe (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2), Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.3.29, 9k MTU, Switch? Jeff, can you fill in here, the system should be familiar to you): Success 127.wrf2 base mref ratio=4.82, runtime=1618.248048 That's a pretty decent advantage to IB, isn't? Thanks, Hakon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CALL FOR WORKSHOP PROPOSALS: OnTheMove OTM Federated Conferences and Workshops 2008
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
