[Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Jan 30 05:58:18 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Just in case you've missed the announcements: > http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/222/1/ I'm always happy about new levels pricing agression, but I'm a bit puzzled about for what kind of workloads this will matter. whenever I ask about IB bandwidth, people always point fingers at weather codes, which apparently are fond of doing the transpose in multi-dimension FFT's using all-to-all. while convenient, this seems a bit silly, since transpose is O(N) communications, not O(N^2). higher bandwidth/node also makes sense if you're configuring fairly fat nodes (many cores, probably also lots of ram). but if you do that, you also amortize the networking, so a cheaper IB setup matters less. perhaps there are some extremely file-IO intensive workloads that can sustain ~1 GB/s, but I'd expect them to require some hefty fileserving hardware, which would also hide the IB cost. IB for gaming? I have one ratio: 1e-1/3e-6. that's human reaction time versus IB latency. also, I think it's a bit disingenous to use 10G Chelsio TOE to compare, rather than 10G Myri which is cheaper and faster. also: http://www.chelsio.com/sandia_benchmark_tech.html finally, how the heck do you make Gb as slow as 120 us? -Mark "not actually anti-IB" Hahn. PS: does anyone have first-hand experience with ConnectX performance?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cheap SDR IB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
