[Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.eduWed Jan 16 07:25:13 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Next message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ashley Pittman wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:18 -0500, Douglas Eadline wrote: >> I get the desire for fault tolerance etc. and I like the idea >> of migration. It is just that many HPC people have spent >> careers getting applications/middleware as close to the bare >> metal as possible. The whole VM concept seems orthogonal to >> this goal. I'm curious how people are approaching this >> problem. > > There was a paper on this at SC, I don't know if you caught it... > > http://sc07.supercomputing.org/schedule/event_detail.php?evid=11066 > > If I was to try and sum it up in one paragraph it would be: > > "The advantages of virtulisation are obvious but for some reason the HPC > community have been slow to reap these benefits, we predict that this is > because of a perception that the performance of comms and VM operations > suffers when virtulised. This is true however we have demonstrated that > with months of work this performance loss could be minimised such that > instead of slowing down performance a lot it would only slow down > performance a bit." > > I think progress is being made on the comms front, both in terms of raw > numbers (bandwidth/latency) but also in reducing CPU usage but we are > still a long way from it being widely used. I'm constantly reminded of a meeting early on in the SCOOP project, which I participate in (http://scoop.sura.org). "We're able to virtualize our model applications using VMware and only see a 13% performance hit". Note that, at this time I was tweaking for ms upgrades in MPI communications.... We need to look at virtualization as a means of mitigating, on a heterogeneous hardware environment, the concept of porting to every different available machine type. In other words, I think that for a grid environment, we might see a lot of benefit for virtualization but for a local, homogeneous, cluster, it's less an issue. By the way: In order to compensate for their "13%" degradation, I had to nearly double the number of virtual nodes over real nodes to get the same performance data. That's "expensive" but very do-able on a grid environment. gerry -- Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.862.3982 FAX: 979.862.3983 Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- Previous message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Next message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
