[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comThu Feb 28 00:38:11 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 23:30 -0800, Bill Broadley wrote: > > I don't see any particular reason why memory bandwidth can go through a full > doublings in the near future if there was a market for it, last I checked > nvidia was doing pretty well ;-) > > [1] Sorry to use marketing bandwidth, I've not seen stream numbers for CUDA > yet. I hope to work on one though. If anyone has numbers please speak > up. Some numbers here: http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=52686 Running this on my 8600 card I get: STREAM Benchmark implementation in CUDA Array size (single precision)=2000000 using 128 threads per block, 15625 blocks Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 291777.6696 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Scale: 291777.6696 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Add: 437666.5043 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Triad: 437666.5043 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 All the 0.0001 don't look right to me, but its 8:30 here and I should get on with the day job.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
