[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
James Cownie jcownie at cantab.netMon Feb 25 14:04:17 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 25 Feb 2008, at 19:40, Geoff Galitz wrote: > Another thing to consider is that while HT certainly still exists > in the > wild, no new systems implement it, hence limited testing. However, if you believe the The Inquirer, it may be coming back. "Nehalem is projected as arriving late, supporting two, four and eight cores, representing four, eight and 16 threads. " http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/02/24/intel-csi- nehalem-dunnington (Disclaimer: I work for Intel, but The Inquirer appears to know much more than me about this :-) (not hard, since I know nothing)) -- -- Jim -- James Cownie <jcownie at cantab.net> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080225/f9f74fc4/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
