[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comMon Feb 25 11:58:25 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Just for a clarification (for those of us who are hardware deficient), hyperthreading (the Intel mechanism) isn't actually simultaneous, correct? I had assumed so but I appear to be confused about it. Hyperthreading keeps a thread ready to take advantage of stalls in a preceeding thread, but doesn't ever actually perform a second instruction in one click tick, correct? One might think that there are so many pathways on a modern chip that collisions could be managed among several simultaneous threads. Thanks, Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080225/6ffb0430/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
