[Beowulf] Re: wajig for Ubuntu/Debian package management
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seMon Feb 18 03:10:36 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: wajig for Ubuntu/Debian package management
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: wajig for Ubuntu/Debian package management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts <tjrc at sanger.ac.uk> writes: > On 15 Feb 2008, at 11:57 pm, Andrew Piskorski wrote: > >> Their only other major flaw that I'm aware of, is that, just like all >> the rpm based tools, you can only have one single version of a binary >> package installed at a time (yuck!). > > That's not true. Look at the gcc or emacs packages. Or automake. Or > autoconf. Many, many versions, all of which can coexist on your > system at the same time, and you can use update-alternatives to choose > which one is the default. The trick is that the packages have to have > different names, so in the case of gcc there are gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4, > gcc-4.1 etc. But that's not the same package, then. Hm, can you have a package depend on "any version of gcc", without listing the various gcc packages explicitly? Andrew, which tools don't let you have more than one version of an rpm installed? -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: wajig for Ubuntu/Debian package management
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: wajig for Ubuntu/Debian package management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
