[Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comWed Aug 27 07:00:19 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan Louis Scheinine <alscheinine at tuffmail.us> writes: > My list does not include C++ for scientific programming. > The idea here is how to get past the initial difficulties > of using C++. As I've written a few hours ago, simple C > is efficient for numerical programming, as others have said. I've often thought that one of the few really legitimate uses for operator overloading was to add vector/array ops. Getting back to the original topic, a set of C++ classes that handled APL style array operations and automatically parallelized them on vector processors would be quite neat, and would actually be a legitimate use of C++ (unlike the very wide variety of illegitimate uses of the language.) -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
