[Beowulf] Infiniband modular switches
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gilad Shainer Shainer at mellanox.comTue Aug 26 12:50:06 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Infiniband modular switches
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Kidger wrote: > Gilad wrote: > > It was proven by the same person who did the slides you > referred to, > > when doing the same testing on IB DDR we got much better > results with > > IB versus Quadrics. your theory does not really meet reality. > > Care to describe to the list what these results were, and to > speculate about why IB gave better results? > > Daniel > Sure. My intend was not to compare between IB and Quadrics, but to show that the network/host injection rate is very relevant in contention tests. For given host injection rate, increase in network capability reduces the contention (assuming finite number of hosts.....). As for the numbers: Send ave: IB SDR 263MB, Quadrics 369MB, IB DDR 453MB Receive ave: IB SDR 340MB, Quadrics 370MB, IB DDR 547MB I noticed that Quadrics decided to use just part of those numbers for their poster at ISC ... ;-) Gilad.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Infiniband modular switches
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
