[Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew M.A. Cater amacater at galactic.demon.co.ukTue Apr 1 16:11:42 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Next message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 01:55:05AM +0200, Alan Louis Scheinine wrote: > I can't stand it any longer, I've got to make > my "contribution" to this discussion. > Eric Moore cites the text > > a list of all codes and cyphers in use > For this reason, I always thought that > using "code" for programs was considered sloppy jargon > and that in a formal document or article one should > write "computer program" rather than "code". > As Martin Wheeler says, you also have to consider the common understanding and specialist vocabulary of your specific audience: "Code re-use" - may make a computer scientist excited/ill at the thought, depending on his viewpoint of the desirability of this. It may have the same effects on cryptanalysts and computer security consultants - but for entirely different reasons :) Andy - once a trainee lawyer - which profession has been reusing portions of Justinian's Code for millennia. Andy
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Next message: [Beowulf] "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
