[Beowulf] Re: Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Guilherme Menegon Arantes garantes at iq.usp.brWed Sep 26 10:21:56 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:03:10AM -0700, beowulf-request at beowulf.org wrote: > > andrew holway wrote: > > Multi reference quantum chem. Gaussian and Molcas. Hi Andrew, You still need to tell us more about the jobs. I run large active space with large basis set CASPT2 jobs in MOLCAS. Since it's coded rather inefficiently, and the matrixes are huge, it doesn't not fit in memory and scratch files take up to 500Gb. So, you really need a 64bit machine with the fastest disk system you can get. It will be disk/IO bound and the processor will matter little. Also MOLCAS is a serial code in any Multi-ref part, so no use for extra cores/processors. Gaussian is rather limited for Multi-ref QM. So, I guess you will either use it for other kinds of calculations or will gave up using it in favor of only MOLCAS (or MOLPRO, GAMESS, etc...). > As usual, real use case tests are the most realistic predictor of > performance. Joe is right here, but sometimes the hardware is just not avalaible to testing. Regards, G -- Guilherme Menegon Arantes, PhD São Paulo, Brasil ______________________________________________________
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
