[Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Leidel john.leidel at gmail.comWed Sep 26 04:03:36 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What chem codes are you going to be running [NWChem?] On 9/26/07, andrew holway <andrew at moonet.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am looking at chips for a small 20 node cluster for computational > chemistry. I'm trying to get my head around the various merits of the > different ways the cache work. > > Considering the fairly chunky bits of data that are going to be going > through, does anyone have any opinion on how the new 1.9 Barcelona > will perform against a 2.66 woodcrest. Is the Intel front side bus > going to be a significant bottleneck for this type of application? > > Cheers > > Andy > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070926/4cab1cbd/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
