[Beowulf] Barcelona numbers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comMon Sep 10 20:55:36 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona numbers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona numbers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:32:29AM +0000, richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > So with all 8 cores at work from 2 sockets you are seeing 70% of peak assuming > you are using 667 MHz DDR2 I'm not sure what this word "peak" means -- it cannot be achieved by any test under any circumstances, whereas for a processor floating point peak, you can usually do it with some weird code. Much better to call the measured STREAM number the actual peak; then I won't have to let loose the memory bandwidth peak bot complainer once again ;-) > I thought first byte latencies were around 65 nanos for Opteron. Am > I confused? You're misremembering. Opteron latency was always a function of the number of active sockets, and it is usually measured with only one core active, while Bill is doing the more realistic thing of having all the cores active. Run the same code on your favorite Intel if you want to compare. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Barcelona numbers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona numbers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
