[Beowulf] best linux distribution
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tony Travis ajt at rri.sari.ac.ukMon Oct 8 09:40:21 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts wrote: > [...] > You are lighting the blue touchpaper. Basically anything will work. > There's much less difference between Linux distributions than people > think. They basically differ in the way you install packages, and in > some cases in the locations of configuration files. But that's about > it. Go with whatever distribution you or your admins are already > familiar with. Hello, Tim. I agree with you in principle, but in practice many binary packages only work properly under the target release of the target Linux distribution because of their dependencies on particular shared libraries etc. At the source level, of course, none of this matters. However, what many people want (me included) is a team of dedicated volunteers doing the hard work of making sure a collection of binary packages all work well together. > Personally, I prefer Debian-derived distributions to Red Hat workalikes, > but that's just me. Some people like the Gentoo build-it-all-yourself > approach. Some like the Rocks do-all-the-clustering-for-me approach. > But they can all do the job. It depends to a certain extent on how much > you want (or need) to get your own hands dirty. I also prefer Debian-based distro's and still run the openMosix kernel under an Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS server installation on our Beowulf cluster. What I like about APT (the Debian package manager) is the dependency checking and conflict resolution capabilities of "aptitude", which is more robust than the older "apt-get". I previously ran Red Hat 5.3->9 and I've used both "up2date" and "yum". Neither of these is as capable of resolving package conflicts and dependencies as APT. I used APT for RPM when I ran RH9 for exactly this reason. In my opinion, the package management system is a very important factor to take into account when choosing a distribution, as well as the range of tried and tested binary packages that are available. In that respect, Debian/Ubuntu has a lot to recommend it. Tony. -- Dr. A.J.Travis, | mailto:ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk Rowett Research Institute, | http://www.rri.sari.ac.uk/~ajt Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | phone:+44 (0)1224 712751 Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK. | fax:+44 (0)1224 716687
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
