[Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Larry Stewart larry.stewart at sicortex.comTue Oct 2 11:52:21 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The question of OpenMP vs MPI has been around for a long time, for example: http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2001-March/002718.html My general impression is that it is a waste of time to convert from pure MPI to a hybrid approach. For example: www.sc2000.org/techpapr/papers/pap.pap214.pdf On the other hand, here's a fellow who got a 4X speedup by going to hybrid: www.nersc.gov/nusers/services/training/classes/NUG/Jun04/NUG2004_yhe_hybrid.ppt My own view is that with a modern cluster with fast processors and with inter-node communications not that much slower than a cache miss to main memory, the unified MPI model makes more sense, but there are many many papers arguing about this topic. -L -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071002/567c759a/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
