[Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caMon Mar 26 15:54:58 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance characterising a HPC application
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/1336731.html well, if the numbers mean what they appear to mean, this is quite a dramatic breakthrough: 1.2 us, 25M msg/s. since we just happend to be talking about "conventional" IB vs Infinipath (1.29 us, 11.3M msg/s). or is this an example of message aggregation? heck, from the url above, it might even be counting intra-box messages. also, I'm sorta amazed people keep selling (and presumably buying) dual-port IB cards. doesn't that get quite expensive, switch-wise? regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance characterising a HPC application
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
