Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 09:35:19 PDT 2007


Beautiful paean to C Bob:-)
I'd just add that some languages, I think Ada and COBOL, are designed in
part to minimize certain classes of programmer errrors. Those languages are
sorta like the safety codes for wiring public places; they prevent the worst
errors, but do not necessarily well enable the Inner Artist.
Most real-time embedded programming is in C, but in lots of applications you
sacrifice efficiency for safety, like weekly payroll accounting.
Peter


On 3/19/07, Robert G. Brown <rgb at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Mitchell Wisidagamage wrote:
>
> >>
> >>   a) Learn C.  No matter what you do, if you plan to be a "real coder"
> >> you will sooner or later need to learn C.  Sane people don't write
> >> operating systems in Fortran or C++ or Lisp, and there are damn good
> >> reasons for this.  Also you can do amazing things with C and actually
> >> understand what the computer is doing when you do them (because C has
> >> been described on this very list as "a thin veneer of upper-level
> >> language sensibility on top of raw assembler", a phrase that I just
> love
> >> that is SO true even though I can't remember who actually said it.  I
> >> wish it were me but it wasn't:-).  Who knows what LISP is actually
> doing
> >> and how it is doing it? Not even the developers...
> >>
> >
> > I'm a c fan myself. However when I was doing the "safety-critical
> systems"
> > module I was deeply disappointed to learn that c isn't "safe" and
> sometimes
> > "not recommended" (by IEC 1508 when developing safety critical systems).
>
> C for damn sure isn't "safe".  Neither is assembler.  Very few compilers
> could be called safe in the sense that it is impossible to write buggy
> code that is vulnerable to various exploits or at risk of crashing an
> application, but C is arguably more dangerous than most because with
> pointers and inlined assembler you can do "anything".
>
> Total power and complete control is never safe.  C is like an M-1 tank
> armed with pocket nukes and with a built in levitation system and
> antimatter propulsion system -- misuse it and you can blow up whole
> worlds, but it can solve lots of problems very quickly.  Safe is a kiddy
> bike with training wheels -- not fast, not powerful, but if you pedal
> long enough you can get where you want to go.
>
> Unless you get run over by a tank, that is.
>
> > I can understand why c is considered naughty but isn't it bad
> programming
> > (systems development) to blame rather than the flexibility of the
> language?
>
> Absolutely.  With great power comes great responsibility.  Neurosurgery
> is not safe.  Consequently Neurosurgeons require immense amounts of
> training and have to work extremely carefully -- and people still die.
> However, far more of them live!  Putting band-aids on is safe.  However,
> try putting a band-aid on a brain tumor.
>
> > I'm wondering what languages are actually used when developing critical
> > systems (such as aviation and missile control systems?).
> >
> > My uni's LAN is protected but I found a similar lecture series at
> another uni
> > on the net.  See page 25 on:
> >
> https://www.cis.strath.ac.uk/teaching/ug/classes/52.422/programming_languages.pdf
> >
> > Full lecture series:
> > https://www.cis.strath.ac.uk/teaching/ug/classes/52.422/
>
> Got me.  Whatever it is, it is perfectly capable of being buggy.  And
> whatever it is, the compiler itself was very, very likely written in --
> C.
>
>     rgb
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mitchell
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Robert G. Brown                        http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
> Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
> Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
> Phone: 1-919-660-2567  Fax: 919-660-2525     email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070319/966aaed5/attachment.html


More information about the Beowulf mailing list