[Beowulf] programming multicore clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.eduFri Jun 15 12:10:11 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] network raid filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:00:24AM -0500, Gerry Creager wrote: > >> For the forseeable future, I'm not developing much but will use the >> hybrid SMP/DM capabilities in WRF. Takes advantage of SMP availability, >> and supports message passing between SMP nodes. I've not used this >> capability for benchmarking but it appears to offer significant gains. > > Gerry, why do you think WRF is going to behave any different from MM5 > in this aspect? MM5 slows down in hybrid mode. MPI "takes advantage" > of SMP. In fact, on big SMPs like Origin and Altix, MPI programs are > often faster than shared memory or OpenMP programs, unless you've done > a lot of work on the OpenMP program to improve locality. Why? Because > you're forced to worry about locality in an MPI program all the time. Potentially false advertising. NCAR/MMM are of the opinion that it runs faster. I've not tested it yet... >> As we get more hybrid HPC capabilities planning for this will be more >> important. > > I predict a lot of people will waste a lot of time without seeing a > benefit. Likely correct. gerry -- Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983 Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- Previous message: [Beowulf] programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] network raid filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
