[Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beFri Jun 15 06:17:16 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: > unless most of your IPC is this kind of async, unsync, passive data > reference, I wouldn't think twice: go MPI. the current media frenzy > about multicore systems (nothing new!) doesn't change the picture much. Because of everybody going multi-core, everybody is pushing to go multi-threading to exploit these architectures (e.g. the gaming-world and many more). IIUC you're saying that MPI might better exploit these architectures? Interesting POV! t
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
