[Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Beat Rubischon beat at 0x1b.chThu Jul 19 03:50:26 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello! Am 18.7.2007 17:35 Uhr schrieb "Patrick Ohly" unter <patrick.ohly at intel.com>: > For clusters it's time to replace it with a solution that works better > in a LAN. > [2] http://ptpd.sourceforge.net/ It looks like an interesting tool which probably solves a lot of my troubles with inaccurate clocks. One thing I'm currently missing is a short howto to combine ptp and ntp. Is it OK when I use dommands like this or do I shoot myself into the feets? naster# ntpd master# ptpd -t -p slaves# ptpd -g Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon <beat at 0x1b.ch> ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--------------------------------------------------- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
