[Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Jul 12 16:07:53 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Next message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The 2GB dimms emit the same heat as the 1 GB dimms. So if you have a 1000 > node cluster, and you use the larger (slightly more expensive) 2GB dimms vs > the 1GB dimms, you will emit somewhat less heat. I haven't done the assuming the same number of chips per dimm. if your 1G are single-sided, and 2G are double, you save nothing. it's also interesting that for a given generation chip, the higher-clocked dimms are significantly hotter (say, 200 vs 300 mA max draw for 1G pc2/667 vs /800). also, I notice that x16 chips dissipate a lot more than x4 or x8, even though the chips have the same number of onchip banks. I guess this says that the main power issue is driving wide parallel buses at speed... > That and few parts means lower absolute number of failures, but that is > another issue. a very interesting one. I wonder how many people have scrubbing turned on in their cluster, and how many use mcelog to monitor the ECC rate. comments? thanks, mark.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Next message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
