[Beowulf] Cluster Diagram of 500 PC
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comWed Jul 11 21:21:08 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Diagram of 500 PC
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cluster Diagram of 500 PC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: > I don't think that's what I meant. imagine instead that you have 48pt > GE switches, each of which has 4x 10G extra ports. now, take > 5 such switches and fully connect them (each switch has a 10G link > to each of the other 4 switches). I don't think 802.3ad helps here, > since what you want is to _avoid_ a single spanning tree, which would > necessarily have one root. Yes, there is still a spanning tree and it will prevent cycles by choosing a root for you. There is no way to work around it at the pure Ethernet level. Sure, you can play with vlans, but it's more an hack than a well defined way to solve the problem. In practice, you can do this type of topology by using a proprietary "stacking" interface if there is one available. These ports are not Ethernet links, they are backplane extensions, so they are not subject to spanning tree limitations. Of course, it's vendor specific and some switches don't have such stacking ports. You could also turn off the spanning tree, but you cannot call it Ethernet anymore. Another solution is to do layer-3 routing between switches, if you have such IP routing capability. Patrick
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Diagram of 500 PC
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cluster Diagram of 500 PC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
