[Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Anand Avati avati at zresearch.comFri Feb 9 06:39:41 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: fast compiler question (pathscale/portland group/gcc)
- Next message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> nice graph. but how does it look if you compare a single glusterfs
> brick with a single NFS brick?
The purpose of glusterfs has never been to beat NFS in a point to point
throughput competition, since in real world there are a lot of requests
happening in parallel and it is more important to achieve a higher
aggregated bandwidth.
That being said, it is worthy to note that glusterfs is still better than
NFS in point-to-point (single NFS brick vs single glusterfs brick).
On Gig/E - both nfs and glusterfs peak on the link speed for read. for write
glusterfs peaks on the link speed, but nfs did not
On IB - nfs works only with IPoIB, whereas glusterfs does SDP (and ib-verbs,
from the source repository) and is clearly way faster than NFS.
avati
--
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use,
and only a fool will want to use it.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: fast compiler question (pathscale/portland group/gcc)
- Next message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
