[Beowulf] S2466 permanent poweroff, round 2
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comWed Feb 7 11:59:42 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] S2466 permanent poweroff, round 2
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast compiler question (pathscale/portland group/gcc)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That makes it sound like instead of NOOP, it's "test if value is initialized, and raise an error if not" which may not have been intended. You might try commenting out that line. Peter On 2/7/07, David Mathog <mathog at caltech.edu> wrote: > > > However the 5 > > instances where uninitialized variables are used would go a long > > way towards explaining the flakiness of this Tyan board. > > On second thought, no. I checked these code sections and > each instance is like this one: > > Method (_MSG, 1, NotSerialized) > { > Store (Local0, Local0) > } > > Apparently they had to put something into the body of the method > and used "store a value back onto itself" as a sort of no-op. > > Regards, > > David Mathog > mathog at caltech.edu > Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070207/bc900307/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] S2466 permanent poweroff, round 2
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast compiler question (pathscale/portland group/gcc)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
